Optimizing Battery Energy Storage Systems for Grid Reliability: A Comparative Analysis of Sizing Methodologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58425/jegs.v4i4.467Keywords:
Battery energy storage systems, optimization, linear programming, hybrid optimization, capacity planning, energy storage planningAbstract
Aim: The study aims to evaluate and compare optimization strategies for Battery Energy Storage System capacity planning and to determine an efficient and practical approach for enhancing power system stability and reliability in renewable energy dominated grids.
Methods: A systematic evaluation is conducted comparing Linear Programming, Particle Swarm Optimization, and rule based heuristic methods for BESS capacity planning. The analysis uses real operational data from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the California Independent System Operator, and standardized IEEE distribution networks. Performance is assessed based on computational requirements, solution accuracy, and feasibility of implementation. A hybrid two stage optimization framework is developed in which Linear Programming provides initial capacity estimates and Particle Swarm Optimization refines solutions under non linear operational constraints.
Results: Linear Programming achieves mathematically optimal solutions for linearized models and reduces total system costs by 15 to 20 percent compared to baseline scenarios. Particle Swarm Optimization performs effectively under non convex constraints and multiple competing objectives. Rule based methods deliver rapid results with computation times 10 to 100 times faster than optimization based techniques but with lower solution quality. The proposed hybrid framework produces solutions within 1.7 percent of the theoretical optimum while maintaining computational efficiency. Validation using California ISO market data shows that optimization based approaches capture 96 to 98 % of actual revenue opportunities.
Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that no single optimization method is universally optimal for BESS capacity planning. Linear Programming is suitable for linear formulations, Particle Swarm Optimization is effective for complex non linear problems, and rule based methods are useful for rapid decision making. Hybrid optimization approaches provide a balanced solution by combining high accuracy with practical computational performance.
Recommendation: System planners should adopt hybrid optimization strategies that integrate Linear Programming and Particle Swarm Optimization when addressing BESS planning problems involving both linear and non linear constraints. This approach ensures high solution quality while maintaining computational efficiency across diverse grid conditions and planning horizons.
References
Wood Mackenzie. (2024). US grid-scale energy storage pricing: H1 2024 report. Wood Mackenzie Power & Renewables
Song, H., Liu, C., Amani, A. M., Gu, M., Jalili, M., Meegahapola, L., Yu, X., & Dickeson, G. (2024). Smart optimization in battery energy storage systems: An overview. Energy and AI, 17, 100378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2024.100378
California ISO. (2024). 2023 special report on battery storage. Department of Market Monitoring. https://www.caiso.com/Documents/2023-Special-Report-on-Battery-Storage-Jul-16-2024.pdf
Modo Energy. (2024). ERCOT: How much battery energy storage is actually coming online in 2024? Research Report. https://modoenergy.com/research/ercot-battery-energy-storage-system-buildout-2024-delay-times-new-capacity-commercially-operational
Goswami, R., et al. (2025). Optimal allocation of battery energy storage systems for peak shaving and reliability enhancement in distribution systems. Applied Energy, 360, 122855
Mulleriyawage, U. G. K., & Shen, W. X. (2020). Optimally sizing of battery energy storage capacity by operational optimization of residential PV-battery systems: An Australian household case study. Renewable Energy, 160, 852-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.022
Zhang, R., Lee, M., & Huang, L. (2024). Optimization of battery energy storage system (BESS) sizing in different electricity market types considering BESS utilization mechanisms and ownerships. Journal of Cleaner Production, 448, 141956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141956
Richard, B., Le Pivert, X., & Bourien, Y. M. (2020). BESS optimal sizing methodology - Degree of impact of several influencing factors. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.06963
Goswami, R., et al. (2024). Mixed-integer linear programming for optimal BESS allocation in distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 39(2), 1234-1248
Ramasamy, V., Zuboy, J., O’Shaughnessy, E., Feldman, D., Desai, J., Woodhouse, M., Basore, P., & Margolis, R. (2022). U.S. solar photovoltaic system and energy storage cost benchmarks, with minimum sustainable price analysis: Q1 2022 (NREL/TP-7A40-83586). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.2172/1891204
Tee, W. H., et al. (2023). Sizing of battery energy storage system: A multi-objective optimization approach in DIgSILENT PowerFactory. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 13(4), 1589-1598
Khunkitti, S., Siritaratiwat, A., Premrudeepreechacharn, S., Chatthaworn, R., & Watson, N. R. (2022). Optimal location and sizing of BESS for performance improvement of distribution systems with high DG penetration. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2022, 6361243. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6361243
Abdelsattar, M., Mesalam, A., Diab, A. A. Z., et al. (2024). Optimal sizing of a proposed stand-alone hybrid energy system in a remote region of southwest Egypt, applying different meta-heuristic algorithms. Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 16251-16269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09902-9
Energy Storage News. (2024, December 24). Augmentation, BESS pricing and grid-forming: Storage & smart power’s year in review 2024. https://www.energy-storage.news/augmentation-bess-pricing-and-grid-forming-storage-smart-powers-year-in-review-2024/
Zhang, R., Lee, M., & Huang, L. (2024). Rule-based energy management strategies for BESS in different market structures. Energy Policy, 185, 113892
Mulleriyawage, U. G. K., & Shen, W. X. (2020). Two-level optimization framework for residential battery storage systems. Applied Energy, 269, 115012
E3. (2024, December 23). ERCOT year-end snapshot: What changed in 2024. Energy and Environmental Economics. https://www.ethree.com/ercot-snapshot-2024/
Modo Energy. (2024). ERCOT: Where have battery revenues been strongest in 2024? Research Report. https://modoenergy.com/research/ercot-battery-energy-storage-systems-location-strategies-2024-revenues-cycles-loadzone-pricespread-west
Cole, W., & Karmakar, A. (2023). Cost projections for utility-scale battery storage: 2023 update (NREL/TP-6A40-85332). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/85332.pdf
Abed, F. T., Abed, N. K., AlRubeei, I. R. N., & Alrikabi, A. R. H. (2024). Using a genetic algorithm for optimal sizing of a stand-alone hybrid energy system. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 287-300
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sahil Shah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and grant this journal right of first publication. This license allows other people to freely share and adapt the work but must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.






