Community Participation as a Moderator of Household Socio-Economic Traits and Sustainability of Muhuru Community Water Project in Rural Kenya

Authors

  • Hezbon Abong Department of Development Studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi Kenya.
  • Fred K. Wamalwa Department of Development Studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi Kenya.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58425/ajgds.v4i1.411

Keywords:

Socioeconomic characteristics, community participation, water sustainability, governance, rural Kenya

Abstract

Aim: Sustainability of rural water infrastructure in fragile contexts hinges not only on technical design but also on household-level socio-economic dynamics and participatory governance. This study aimed to examine how perceived community participation moderates the relationship between household socio-economic characteristics and sustainability outcomes in the Muhuru Community Water Project, located in Migori County, Kenya.

Methods: Employing a descriptive survey and mixed-methods design, the research sampled 354 households across eight villages using stratified random sampling, complemented by purposive selection of 25 key informants and 45 focus group participants. Data were collected through structured questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions, with tools validated via expert review and pilot testing. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and logistic regression models, while qualitative data were thematically analysed to provide contextual insights. Qualitative data were thematically analysed to enrich interpretation.

Results: Key findings revealed that household education (OR = 1.24, p < 0.001) and income (OR = 6.493, p < 0.05) significantly predicted sustainability outcomes, while perceived importance of participation (OR = 3.16, p < 0.001) and community collaboration (OR = 1.91, p < 0.011) emerged as critical moderating factors. Management effectiveness was the strongest determinant (OR = 65.25, p < 0.001), while general participation and external support showed limited statistical significance.

Conclusion: The study concludes that sustainability is primarily shaped by household agency, socio-economic capacity, and trust in governance rather than infrastructure alone.

Recommendation: It recommends adopting governance models that reflect household realities, tailoring participation strategies to different community groups and strengthening local management systems. These findings offer actionable insights for policymakers, donors, and practitioners seeking to enhance rural water sustainability in arid and semi-arid regions.

References

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

Asbetsadik, T., Mulugeta, G., & Tadesse, H. (2025). Participatory water governance in fragile contexts: Lessons from Ethiopia. African Journal of Water Policy, 12(1), 33–49.

Cominola, A., Piga, D., & Castelletti, A. (2023). Bias-reduced logistic regression for water sustainability modeling. Water Resources Research, 59(2), e2022WR033456. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033456

Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010

Daluwatte, D., Sivakumar, M., & Mutua, F. (2020). Sustainability of rural water supply systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review. Water Policy, 22(6), 1025–1042. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2020.100

Dosu, B., & Owusu, G. (2022). Participatory governance and water sustainability in Ghana’s rural districts. Development Studies Review, 40(1), 55–72.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Koop, S. H. A., van Dorssen, A. J., & Brouwer, S. (2019). Enhancing water governance through participatory approaches: A systems perspective. Sustainability, 11(3), 712. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030712

Madias, C., & Szymkowiak, A. (2022). Fragile governance and household agency in water infrastructure: A comparative study. Journal of Development Infrastructure, 18(4), 233–250.

Marks, D., van der Merwe, B., & Mokoena, T. (2014). Depth versus breadth in community participation: Implications for rural water sustainability. South African Journal of Public Administration, 49(2), 201–218.

Miruka, C. (2016). Community participation and sustainability of water projects in Kenya. African Journal of Development Studies, 8(2), 89–104.

Mpongwana, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2022). Participatory water governance in South Africa: A case for inclusive infrastructure planning. Journal of African Infrastructure, 10(1), 45–61.

Mwangi, J. (2014). Socio-economic factors influencing the sustainability of rural water projects in Kenya. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 30(3), 345–360.

Nkonjera, B. (2008). Challenges of water project sustainability in ASAL regions. Kenya Journal of Development Practice, 5(1), 22–38.

Nyakwaka, G., & Benard, M. (2019). Community engagement and rural water project outcomes in Western Kenya. East African Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 101–117.

Omondi, P., Odek, T., & Siringi, E. (2019). Participation and performance of community water projects in Kenya. Journal of African Public Policy, 11(2), 77–93.

Salinas, R. (2025). Equity-sensitive frameworks for rural water governance. Global Development Review, 47(1), 15–34.

Shields, K., Mwega, F., & Kumamaru, T. (2021). Inclusive infrastructure planning in fragile contexts: Lessons from East Africa. International Journal of Development Planning, 36(2), 199–218

Downloads

Published

2025-09-22

How to Cite

Abong, H., & Wamalwa, F. K. (2025). Community Participation as a Moderator of Household Socio-Economic Traits and Sustainability of Muhuru Community Water Project in Rural Kenya. American Journal of Gender and Development Studies, 4(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.58425/ajgds.v4i1.411