Lord Bute and Reform: A Failure in Leading the Change Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58425/jlg.v3i2.252Keywords:
Lord Bute, George III, change process, change leadership, John KotterAbstract
Aim: This study examined the change process in politics by looking at Lord Bute’s tenure as British prime minister.
Methods: The study draws on primary and secondary sources, including John Kotter’s eight-step change model, to evaluate Bute’s political reform efforts. This qualitative study relied on biographies, political histories, correspondence, speeches, and other sources from the figures involved.
Results: While he proposed one of the most monumental reform efforts in 18th century British politics, Bute failed to see them through thanks to his lack of experience on the political stage and other factors. Despite the findings of most historians, Bute achieved some important successes during his brief term as prime minister.
Conclusion: By the metrics of Kotter’s model, Bute did not lead the change process successfully. While Bute offered a coherent change vision, relied on some excellent supporters in office and in the media, and achieved some impressive political victories, his lack of experience ensured he fell short of his stated goal of reforming British political culture and government.
Recommendations: With Bute tackling many of the same issues that current leaders face, more study is needed of this important British political leader. A study of Bute’s tenure as prime minister offers insights on balancing military commitments with increased deficit spending and a rising national debt.
References
Anderson, F. (2000). Crucible of war: The Seven Years’ War and the fate of empire in British North America, 1754-1766. New York: Knopf.
Ayling, S. (1976). The elder Pitt. New York: McKay.
Aziz, A. (2017). “A change management approach to improving safety and preventing needle stick injuries.” Journal of Infection Prevention. (18)5, 257-262.
Banke, R. (2017) Bute’s empire: Reform, reaction, and the roots of imperial crisis. [Abstract] Doctoral dissertation, University of Notre Dame]. Retrieved from: https://curate.nd.edu/show/f1881j9594n
Baskett, T. (1760) His Majesty’s most gracious speech to both houses of Parliament, on Tuesday the eighteenth day of November, 1760. London: Star. Holborn Hill. Retrieved from: https://www.rct.uk/collection/604332/george-iii
Brewer, J. (1973). The misfortunes of Lord Bute: A case-study in eighteenth-century political argument and public opinion. The Historical Journal. 16(1), 3-43. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2637914
Brewer, J. (1976). Party ideology and popular politics at the accession of George III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brooke, J. (1972). King George III: America’s last monarch. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Browning, R. (1975). The Duke of Newcastle. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bullion, J. (1982). A great and necessary measure: George Grenville and the genesis of the Stamp Act, 1763-1765. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Bullion, J. (2017). Prelude to disaster: George III and the origins of the American Revolution. New York: Peter Lang.
Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Butterfield, H. (1957). George III and the historians. London: Collins.
Calloway, C. G. (2006). The scratch of a pen: 1763 and the transformation of North America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cash, A. H. (2006). John Wilkes: The scandalous father of civil liberty. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Forster, C.P. (1978). The uncontrolled chancellor: Charles Townshend and his American policy. Providence: The Rhode Island Bicentennial Foundation.
Galli, B.J. (2018). Change management models: A comparative analysis and concerns. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 46(3), 124-132.
Griffin, P. (2017). The Townshend moment: The making of empire and revolution in the eighteenth century. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hayton, D.W. (2019). Conservative revolutionary: The lives of Lewis Namier. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Hibbert, C. (1998). George III: A personal history. New York: Basic Books.
Hoffman, R. J. S. (1973). The Marquis: A study of the Lord Rockingham, 1730-1782. New York: Fordham University Press.
Kotter, J. P. (1990) A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York: The Free Press.
Kotter, J.P. (2012). Leading change. Boston: Harvard University Business Review Press.
Kotter, J.P. (2014). Accelerate: Building strategic agility for a faster-moving world. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Kotter, J.P., Akhtar, V. and Gupta, G. (2021) Change: How organizations achieve hard-to-imagine results in uncertain and volatile times. Hoboken: Wiley.
Land, J. (2010). The price of empire: Britain’s military costs during the Seven Years’ War [Master’s thesis, Appalachian State University]. Retrieved from: https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/f/Land,%20Jeremy_2010_Thesis.pdf
Lovat-Fraser, J.A. (1912). John Stuart, Earl of Bute. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McKelvey, J. L. (1973). George III and Lord Bute: the Leicester House years. Durham: Duke University Press.
Middleton, R. (1985). The bells of victory: The Pitt-Newcastle ministry and the conduct of the Seven Years’ War, 1757-1762. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Namier, L. (1957). The structure of politics at the accession of George III (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
Namier, L. (1961). England in the age of the American Revolution. Second Edition. London: Macmillan.
Namier, L. & Brooke, J. (1964). Charles Townshend. London: Macmillan.
Pares, R. (1953). King George III and the politicians. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pollack, J. and Pollack, R. (2015) “Using Kotter’s eight stage process to manage an organizational change program: Presentation and practice/” Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28, 51-65.
Rajan, R. and Ganesan, R (2017). “A critical analysis of John P. Kotter’s change management framework.” Asian Journal of Research in Business, Economics, and Management, 7(7), 181-203.
Rashed, Z. E. (1951). The peace of Paris, 1763. Liverpool: University of Liverpool Press.
Rea, R.R. (1963). The English press in politics, 1760-1774. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Schweizer, K.W. (1977). Lord Bute, Newcastle, Prussia, and the Hague overtures: A re-examination. Albion: A quarterly journal concerned with British studies. 9(1), 72-97 Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4048220
Schweizer, K.W. (1981). William Pitt, Lord Bute, and the peace negotiations with France, May-September 1761. Albion: A quarterly journal concerned with British studies. 13(3), 262-275. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4048850
Schweizer, K.W. (1988). Lord Bute: Interpreted in history. In K.W. Schweizer (Ed.). Lord Bute: Essays in re-interpretation (pp. 1-15). Leicester: Leicester University Press.
Schweizer, K.W. (1997). English xenophobia in the 18th century: The case of Lord Bute. International Review of Scottish Studies. 22(1), 6-26. Retrieved from: https://www.irss.uoguelph.ca/index.php/irss/issue/view/82
Sedgwick, R. (Ed.). (1939). Letters from George III to Lord Bute, 1756-1766. London: Macmillan.
Sher, R.B. (1988). ‘The favourite of the favouite’: John Home, Bute and the politics of patriotic poetry. In K.W. Schweizer (Ed.). Lord Bute: Essays in re-interpretation (pp. 181-212). Leicester: Leicester University Press.
Smith, C.D. (1979). The early career of Lord North, the prime minister. Rutherford: Farleigh Dickinson University Press.
Tuchman, B. (1984). The march of folly: From Troy to Vietnam. New York: Knopf.
Wortley, E. S. (Ed.). (1925). A prime minister and his son: From the correspondence of the 3rd Earl of Bute and of Lt. General the Hon. Sir Charles Stuart, K.B. London: John Murray.
Yorke, P. C. (Ed.). (1913). The life and correspondence of Philip Yorke: Earl of Hardwicke, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain. Volume Three. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain the copyright and grant this journal right of first publication. This license allows other people to freely share and adapt the work but must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
